Fachgebiet Cognitive and Developmental Psychology

Wintersemester 2018-2019

November 08, 2018

Speaker: Prof. Dr. Fred Mast (Cognitve Psychology, Perception and Research Methods - Bern Universtiy, invited by Prof. Thomas Lachmann)

Topic: Sensory Inference and Cognitive Processes: The Case of Vestibular Perception

Abstract: Numerous studies have demonstrated that sensory information provided by the vestibular system is involved in cognitive processes such as mental rotation, body representation, numerical tasks and affective control. Despite these interesting empirical findings, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. So far, only little consideration has been given to computational aspects. I will present empirical data from healthy participants and patients, and a new computational approach. The basic idea is that interactions between online sensorimotor processing and offline usage helps to better conceptualize the interplay between vestibular perception and cognitive processes. 


November 15, 2018

Speaker: Prof. Dr. Jon Andoni Duñabeitia (LAELE, Lingüística Aplicada a la Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjeras - Nebrija University, invited by Prof. Thomas Lachmann)

Topic: The real impact of learning foreign languages

Abstract: Native languages are typically acquired in emotionally rich family contexts, while foreign languages are often acquired in emotionally different academic environments. As a consequence of this difference, it has been suggested that bilinguals’ emotional reactivity in foreign language contexts is reduced as compared to native language contexts. In this talk I will present different studies that demonstrate how pervasive foreign language effects can be and how they can alter seemingly automatic responses that are of clear importance in our daily life. I will also discuss some of the limits of these effects and I’ll provide some ideas to counteract these effects by adopting new educational approaches in foreign language teaching.


November 29, 2018

Speaker: Prof. Dr. Julia Karbach (Cognition and Development Lab - Landau University, invited by Prof. Thomas Lachmann)

Topic: Cognitive plasticity across the lifespan: Individual differences, training and transfer effects

Abstract: The field of cognitive training research has evolved considerably over the last decade, especially in the domain of working memory (WM) training and executive functions (EF) training. There is no doubt that intensive cognitive training results in performance gains across a wide range of tasks and in participants of various ages. While most studies have also shown that these gains transfer to tasks measuring the same ability as the training task, transfer to other task domains and even to activities of daily living seems to be less consistent and has inspired heated debates in the field. Moreover, individual differences in training and transfer effects are usually substantial, indicating that some individuals benefit more from an intervention than others. Based on recent findings from WM and EF training, I will illustrate age differences and individual differences in training outcomes. I will discuss predictors of individual differences (such as motivation and cognitive performance at baseline) and highlight important issues that may be considered to disentangle the mechanisms underlying cognitive plasticity in order for the field to move forward. 


December 06, 2018

Speaker: Prof. Dr. Ellen Aschermann (Department of Psychology - Cologne University, invited by Prof. Thomas Lachmann)

Topic: Children`s source identification – the impact of different interview conditions

Abstract: During school age children learn information from different sources. Although the content of the learned information is easily kept, the source of the information is often forgotten. In eyewitness context, the source of an information plays an important role and accuracy of source identification has been a major topic in children`s eyewitness research (cf. Roebers, Moga & Schneider, 2001). In our study (N=105, age 7-11) we investigated the role of accuracy motivation on primary school children’s event recall. The design was a 2 (recognition test: forced vs. withhold) x 2 (punishment: detracting token vs. informational feedback) between-subject design. All children heard two stories about circus visits and were interrogated after seven days about this situation. After a cognitive reinstatement instruction, they delivered a free report and were subsequently given a source recognition test. In the forced recognition condition, participants were forced to provide an answer to each question in the recognition test. In the withhold recognition condition, they were encouraged to withhold an uncertain answer by saying “I don`t know”, if they felt unsure about their answer. The second factor “punishment” was realised by either detracting a token from the initial stock for each incorrect answer or by an informational feedback about the correctness of each answer. In contrast to the results of Roebers and coworkers the answers in the forced recognition conditions were most accurate compared to the withhold condition. The punishment did not result in more accurate recognition indices. From these (partly unexpected) results we will discuss the impact of accuracy motivation and memory strategies in children’s source identification.


December 13, 2018

Speaker: Dr Paul Engelhardt (Lecturer in the School of Psychology, East Anglia University, invited by Dr. Leigh Fernandez)

Topic: Eye movements in dyslexia: An analysis of sentence comprehension and underlying risk factors

Abstract: Eye tracking is commonly used to investigate online processing in reading, but eye movement (EM) studies of sentence comprehension in dyslexia are shockingly absent in the literature. We examined several different types of sentences (garden paths, subject/object relatives, passives), which are often used to investigate mechanisms of language comprehension in typically-developing adults. We were also interested in how cognitive risk factors associated with dyslexia (e.g. working memory and processing speed) relate to EMs and comprehension. 50 dyslexic adults were compared to 50 adult controls. Participants read sentences, and answered comprehension questions. To investigate risk factors, participants completed a battery of cognitive/neuropsychological tests. Dyslexics, generally showed poorer comprehension and longer reading times, especially at difficult regions. They also made longer regression paths. Regarding risk factors, we found stronger relationships with working memory compared to processing speed for both reading times and regression paths. Results are interpreted by integrating EM findings and comprehension with theoretical psycholinguistic models and theories of dyslexia (e.g. Verbal Efficiency).


January 10, 2019

Speaker: Prof. Dr. Elke Teich (Department of Language Science and Technology, Saarland University, invited by Prof. Shanley Allen)

Topic: An optimal code for communication: the case of scientific English

Abstract: Language use is characterized by variation according to situational context, giving rise to registers that serve specific communicative purposes, such as scientific communication (Halliday and Martin, 1993). While there is plenty of descriptive, corpus-based work on registers, there are only few attempts at explaining why a given register settles on particular linguistic choices at the expense of others. Here, we pursue an information-theoretic explanation of register formation, according to which convergence in linguistic choices is beneficial for communication. In the talk, we sketch the  linguistic development of Scientific English in the late modern period (1700-1900) on the basis of  an electronic corpus of scientific text from the Transactions of the Royal Society (Kermes et al., 2016).  Using selected information-theoretic measures, we (a) detect the linguistic patterns that become  characteristic of scientific language over time and (b) evaluate their contribution to the formation of an "optimal" code for scientific communication (Degaetano-Ortlieb and Teich, 2018).  The work reported on is carried out in a project on the linguistic development of Scientific English and supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) as one of 16 projects under grant 'SFB 1102: Information Density and Linguistic Encoding' (http://www.sfb1102.uni-saarland.de/).


  • Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stefania and Elke Teich, 2018. Using relative entropy for detection and analysis of periods of diachronic linguistic change. Proceedings of the 2nd Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature , COLING 2018, Santa Fe, NM, USA, ACL.
  • Halliday, M.A.K.  and J.R. Martin, 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. The Falmer Press, London.
  • Kermes, Hannah, Stefania Degaetano-Ortlieb, Ashraf Khamis, Jörg Knappen and Elke Teich, 2016. The Royal Society Corpus: From Uncharted Data to Corpus. Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Portoroz, Slovenia, ELRA.


January 24, 2019

Speaker: Dr. Mareike Bayer


February 07, 2019

Speaker: Prof. Dr. Jäkel Frank (Chair for Models of Higher Cognition at the Centre for Cognitive Science, Darmstadt University, invited by Thomas Lachmann)

Topic: Concepts and Categories: Combining Insights from Machine Learning and Experimental Psychology

Abstract: Categorization is a fundamental cognitive ability. Many, if not all, highercognitive functions, like language or problem-solving, crucially depend on categorization. Therefore, categorization has been studied by cognitive scientists and researchers in artificial intelligence alike. Early machine learning algorithms for categorization were inspired by psychology and neuroscience, but today machine learning is a mature field and more recent methods have been developed far beyond their original cognitive motivations. These methods, in turn, can be used to inform experimental studies of human categorization behavior. I will show several examples of how insights from machine learning can feed back into experimental psychology. This is, however, not a one way route: Cognitive models can still shed light on human conceptual behaviors that currently no computer can emulate. I will argue that a full understanding of concepts and categories will depend on a combination of insights from machine learning and experimental psychology.


Sommersemester 2018

April 12, 2018

Note, this appointment will start at 3:15 and will end at 6 pm!

Speakers: Master students from Cognitive Science

Topic: Mini-Conference Cognitive Science - I

Abstracts: Talks and poster presentations from various labrotations



April 19, 2018

Speaker: PD Dr. Frederike Hanke (invited by Prof. Friauf and Dr. Patricia Wesseling)

Topic: Living at and in the sea – how the senses contribute to harbor seal orientation, navigation, and foraging

Abstract: Harbor seals live at the coast where they can often be seen hauled out on the beach. However, from time to time, they leave their haul out places and return to the sea for foraging. Although they were observed travelling up to 50km to reach their foraging grounds, they are able to refind their haul out places. While we thus know from tagging studies that harbor seals are very well oriented in their habitat, we hardly know anything about the underlying mechanisms of orientation and navigation. In my talk, I would like to outline how the senses (may) contribute to seal orientation and navigation as well as to foraging.



April 26, 2018

No Colloquium (due to Haaß Talk on April 25 with Gerd Gigerenzer)



May 3, 2018

Speakers:Students of Cognitive Science

Topic: Mini-Conference Cognitive Science - II



May 17, 2018

Speaker: Theres Grüter (University of Hawai´i - invited by Prof. Allen)

Topic: Thinking ahead in a second language: On the role of prediction in L2 processing

Abstract: The role of prediction in native language (L1) processing has been investigated, and debated, extensively over the past couple of decades. Yet it is only in the last few years that prediction/anticipation in second language (L2) processing has become a topic of interest. In this talk, I will discuss how the investigation of prediction in L2 processing may help us move beyond the common but rather unsatisfying description of differences between L1 and L2 speakers as L2 learners having “a processing problem”. In recent and on-going research in our lab, we have used online (visual-world eye-tracking) and offline methods to probe to what extent L2 listeners engage in proactive ‘thinking ahead’ during sentence and discourse processing. Drawing on findings from studies targeting various linguistic cues that can give rise to anticipatory processing - including classifiers in Mandarin Chinese and grammatical aspect in English - I will argue that L2 speakers do not necessarily differ from L1 speakers in whether or not they engage in prediction, but in how and when they engage in prediction, and what information they use to generate expectations about upcoming information. Taken together, these findings suggest that prediction is a universal mechanism of human language processing (and behavior more generally), and that L1 and L2 speakers make adaptive use of this mechanism depending on its utility given their knowledge and processing goals.



May 24, 2018

no Colloquium



May 31, 2018

no Colloquium



June 7, 2018

Speaker: Dr. Joseph Brooks, Senior Lecturer in Psychology, Keele University - invited by Prof. Tandra Ghose

Topic: More than mere association: Relationships between perceptual grouping and figure-ground organisation

Abstract: Figure-ground organization and perceptual grouping are classic topics in Gestalt and perceptual psychology. They often appear alongside one another in introductory textbook chapters on perception and have a long history of investigation. However, they are typically discussed as separate processes of perceptual organization with their own distinct phenomena and mechanisms. Here, I will propose that perceptual grouping and figure-ground organisation are mechanistically linked and that grouping provides a basis for explaining a wide range of figure-ground principles. In particular, I will demonstrate a new class of figure-ground principles based on perceptual grouping between edges and demonstrate that this inter-edge grouping (IEG) is a powerful influence on figure-ground organization. Other results will show that grouping between edges and regions (i.e., edge-region grouping) can affect figure-ground organisation and that contextual influences in figure-ground organisation are gated by perceptual grouping between edges. In addition to these new phenomena, we can also describe some classic figure-ground principles (e.g., symmetry, convexity, etc.) using perceptual grouping mechanisms. Our results suggest that figure-ground organization and perceptual grouping have more than a mere association within Gestalt psychology. Instead, perceptual grouping may provide a mechanism underlying a broad class of new and extant figure-ground principles.



Please note: This week´s meeting will be on 
Wednesday, June 13
10:30 to 12:00 in 57/215!

Speaker: Prof. Dr. Anja Arnhold (University of Alberta - invited by Prof. Shanley Allen)





June 21, 2018

Speaker: Prof. Dr. Alexander Schütz (Uni Marburg - invited by Prof. Thomas Schmidt)

Topic: Modulation of eye movements by value and decisions




November 16, 2017

Psychology Colloquia/Kolloquium "Cognitive Science"

Donnerstags 15:30 bis 17:00 Uhr in Geb. 57, Raum 508



November 16, 2017

Speaker: Dr. Garvin Brod (Center for Individual Development and Adaptive Education of Children at Risk (IDeA) & German Institute for International Educational Research (DIPF), Frankfurt), invited by Daniela Czernochowski)

Topic: Is asking students to make predictions an effective technique to activate prior knowledge and improve learning?

Abstract: It is well known that activating students' prior knowledge of a subject improves their learning performance. But what are simple techniques to reliably activate knowledge? And are these techniques equally effective in university students and school children? In two experiments, we tested whether asking university students and school children (grades 4–5) to make a prediction about a specific outcome is a viable technique to activate their knowledge and improve memory performance. We hypothesized that making a prediction would particularly benefit memory for events that violate expectancies, because making a wrong prediction should yield a surprise reaction, which in turn should boost memory for an event. The surprise reaction was measured using pupillometry. In short, findings were in line with our hypothesis but additionally pointed to age-related differences in the way that surprise is leveraged for learning. Implications for theory and educational practice will be discussed.


November 23, 2017

Speaker: Dr. Jana Jarecki (Basel University - Germany, invited by Tandra Ghose)

Topic: Class-conditional independence in human classification learning

Abstract: Humans excel in categorization. Yet from a computational standpoint, learning a novel probabilistic classification task involves severe computational challenges. The present paper investigates one way to address these challenges: assuming class-conditional independence of features. This feature in-dependence assumption simplifies the inference problem, allows for informed inferences about novel feature combinations, and performs robustly across different statistical environments. We designed a new Bayesian classification learning model (the dependence-independence structure and category learn-ing model, DISC-LM) that incorporates varying degrees of prior belief in class-conditional independence, learns whether or not independence holds, and adapts its behavior accordingly. Theoretical results from two simulation studies demonstrate that classification behavior can appear to start simple, yet adapt effectively to unexpected task structures. Two experiments — de-signed using optimal experimental design principles — were conducted with human learners. Classification decisions of the majority of participants were best accounted for by a version of the model with very high initial prior belief in class-conditional independence, before adapting to the true envi-ronmental structure. Class-conditional independence may be a strong and useful default assumption in category learning tasks.


Reading (optional): Jarecki, J. B., Meder, B., & Nelson, J. D. (2017). Naive and robust: class-conditional independence in human classification learning. Cognitive Science, 1–39. doi:10.1111/cogs.12496

December 07, 2017

Speaker: Dr. Rebecca Förster (Bielefeld University - Germany, invited by Tandra Ghose)

Topic: Innovative techniques for measuring visual attention

Abstract: Visual selective attention – the ability to preferably process task-relevant visual input reaching our eyes – is indispensable for purposeful adaptive behavior in our crowded visual world. Unsurprisingly, visual selective attention is a highly studied and influential topic across research fields reaching from basic research over clinical research up to robotics. I will present how interdisciplinary approaches and innovative techniques such as static and mobile eye tracking, head-mounted displays, and G-Sync technology can be used to reveal interesting new insights into the mechanisms of visual attention and may foster the development of efficient and convenient applications.


December 11, 2017 

SPECIAL TALK - (Monday, 13:00, Biulding 57, Room 215)

Speaker: Prof. Dr. Koichi Kise  (Dept. of Computer Science and Intelligent Systems – Osaka, Japan, invited  by  Andreas Dengel and Thomas Lachmann)

Topic: Quantified Reading and Learning for Sharing Experiences

Abstract: In my talk, I will present two topics. The first is an overview of our recently started project called "experiential supplement", which is to transfer human experiences by recording and processing them to be acceptable by others. The second is sensing technologies for producing experiential supplements in the context of learning. Because a basic activity of learning is reading, we also deal with the sensing of reading. Methods for quantifying the reading in terms of the number of read words, the period of reading, type of read documents, identifying read words are shown with experimental results. As for learning, we propose methods for estimating the English ability, confidence in answers to English questions, and estimating unknown words. The above are sensed by various sensors including eye trackers, EOG, EEG, and the first person vision.


December 11, 2017 

SPECIAL TALK - (Monday, 17:15, Biulding 42, Hörsaal 110 - Biologisches Kolloquium)

Speaker: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Erwin Neher (MPI für biophysikalische Chemie, Göttingen; Nobelpreis für Medizin und Physiologie, 1991, invited by EcKhard Friauf)

Topic: Modulation of Short-term Plasticity at a Glutamatergic Synapse

Abstract: Synaptic Plasticity is held to be at the basis of most signal processing capabilities of the central nervous system. Long-term plasticity receives most attention by neuroscientists, since it underlies learning and memory. Short-term plasticity (STP), on the other hand, is not less important, since it mediates basic signal processing tasks, such as filtering, gain control, adaptation, and many more. My laboratory has studied STP at the Calyx of Held, a glutamatergic nerve terminal in the auditory pathway, which is large enough to be voltage-clamped in the ‘whole-cell mode’, using patch pipettes. STP is highly modulated by second messengers, such as Ca++ and diacylglycerol. In particular, it was shown that such modulators accelerate a process called ‘superpriming’, a slow transition of release-ready vesicles from a ‘normally primed’ state to a faster, ‘superprimed’ one (Lee et al. 2013; PNAS 110, 15079). Recently, we could demonstrate that this same process also mediates Post-Tetanic Potentiation, a medium-term form of synaptic plasticity (Taschenberger et al., 2016; PNAS 113, E4548-57). These findings will be discussed in the framework of literature data on various forms of short-term plasticity.


December 14, 2017

Speaker: Dr. Pieter Moors (Leuven University - Belgium, invited by Sven Panis)

Topic: Processing invisible stimuli during continuous flash suppression: stimulus fractionation vs. stimulus integration

Abstract: Continuous flash suppression (CFS) is a perceptual suppression technique which was introduced by Tsuchiya and Koch (2005) about ten years ago. It relies on the phenomenon of binocular rivalry where dissimilar visual input presented to both eyes leads to perceptual alternations of the stimuli presented to each eye. In CFS, an ensemble of rapidly flickering geometrical patterns is presented to one eye, whilst another stimulus is presented to the other eye, yielding prolonged perceptual suppression of that stimulus. Presented as a highly effective suppression technique, researchers readily started seeking for the boundaries of unconscious processing under such deep perceptual suppression. A particularly promising paradigm proved to be breaking CFS, in which the time it takes for the initially suppressed stimulus to enter awareness, is measured. A series of studies was published from which the converging conclusion seemed to be that the perceptually suppressed stimulus was processed in a fully integrated manner, up to the semantic level. For example, semantic congruency violations in sentences could be detected or arithmetic operations could be performed on invisible stimuli. In this talk, I will present three different studies, all challenging the stimulus integration account. Based on our findings, as well as those of other authors, we propose that stimuli suppressed through CFS are represented in a fractionated way, and processing is limited to elementary parts of the stimulus. We outline some predictions such a model makes, and evidence consistent with it.



January 18, 2018

Speaker: Dr. Christoph Scheepers (Glasgow University - UK, invited by Leigh Fernandez)

Topic: Pupillometric work on emotional resonance in L1 vs. L2 - Pupil dilation as an indicator of reduced emotional resonance in one’s second language

A number of behavioural and physiological studies suggests that late bilinguals ‘feel less’ in their second (L2) as opposed to their first language (L1) – a phenomenon dubbed reduced emotional resonance in L2 (e.g.,  Pavlenko, 2006; Dewaele, 2010). However, few studies to date have 
carefully controlled for participants’ proficiency in L2 or variables affecting word recognition (e.g., length, frequency, etc.). The present pupillometry experiments were designed to overcome these shortcomings.

In Experiment 1, 32 Finnish-English and 32 German-English late bilinguals (all highly proficient in English) were tested both in their first language (L1) and in English (L2). An additional control group (32 English monolinguals) was tested only in English. In each language version of the experiment, we presented 30 high-arousal (e.g. “alarm”) and 30 low-arousal (e.g., “swamp”) words, alongside 30 emotionally neutral distractors. Word length, frequency, valence, and abstractness were controlled for both by design and analytically. Participants were shown the stimuli while their pupillary responses were continuously monitored (eye-tracking). The experiment confirmed reliably enhanced pupil-dilation in response to high- vs. low-arousal words, but only when participants were tested in their respective L1, and in spite of being able to recognise the words in L2.

In Experiment 2, 240 English words (80 high-, 80 low-arousal, and 80 distractors, carefully matched on a number of lexical variables) was presented to 116 participants from various language backgrounds (92 bilinguals with English as L2, and 24 monolingual English speakers). All participants were pre-assessed in terms of English proficiency (LexTALE). Again, participants’ pupillary responses were continuously monitored during the main task. There was no difference in pupillary responses to high- vs. low-arousal words in bilinguals (English L2), but clear pupillary effects in English monolinguals 
(English L1). Importantly, this word type * group interaction remained significant even when differences in English proficiency were analytically controlled for. We conclude that reduced emotional resonance in L2 is real, and that it is not due to word recognition difficulties or differences in language proficiency.



January 25, 2018

Speaker: Prof. Dr. Rosana Tristão (University of Brasília - Brazil, invited by Thomas Lachmann)

Topic: Auditory Processing Disorder and Cognitive Profile in Children with Specific Learning Disorder

Abstract: We have been studying the development of auditory processing (AP) in infants and children with neurodevelopmental disorders due to different causes as Down syndrome and prematurity. In this presentation I will focus on AP disorder, its relation to specific learning disorder (SLD) in children and its the impact over cognitive profile and visuomotor skills. We investigated 25 children (7-14-years-old) through intelligence and visuomotor tests and audiologic evaluation that encompassed auditory threshold; brainstem auditory evoked response (BERA), event related potentials (ERP) P3/N2; behavioral auditory processing tests (APE): dichotic digits (DD), speech in noise (SN), sound localization (LOC), staggered spondaic words (SSW). Multiple linear regressions were used, and effects were found among AP disorder and WISC tests, IQs and indexes and visuomotor performance. We concluded that children with altered auditory processing presented a specific cognitive profile including lower verbal and spatial reasoning performance that is sensitive to parental education level and they should go through complete multimodal examination for better investigation of their specificities.



February 01, 2018

Speaker: Dr. Evan Kidd (MPI for Psycholinguistics - Australia National University, invited by Shanley Allen)

Topic: Individual differences in language acquisition

Abstract: Language acquisition is a developmental process categorised by significant yet stable individual differences. While we should expect individual differences to predict growth within domains (e.g., vocabulary at 12 months predicting vocabulary at 24 months), cross-domain predictive relations are particularly insightful because they can reveal important insights into the process of acquisition, serving to constrain our theoretical models by revealing patterns of representation and drivers of developmental change across time.  In this talk I will discuss an ongoing individual difference project being conducted in the ANU Language Lab (https://anulanguagelab.wordpress.com/).  The Canberra Longitudinal Child Language Project is a large-scale longitudinal individual differences study of children’s language processing. The study is tracking children’s language processing skills across time and linking them to their subsequent language acquisition, with the aim of moving towards more dynamic mechanistic explanations of the acquisition process. In this talk I will discuss the initial phase the project, which investigated how children’s segmentation skills relate to late vocabulary development. Using ERPs, we found robust individual differences 9-month-old children’s ability to extract words from running speech, which subsequently predicted vocabulary development and the children’s ability to learn novel labels.



February 08, 2018

Speaker: Prof. Dr. Sonja A. Kotz (Maastricht University - The Netherlands & Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences - Germany, invited by Patricia Wesseling)

Topic: Multimodal emotional speech perception 

Abstract: Social interactions rely on multiple verbal and non-verbal information sources and their interaction. Crucially, in such communicative interactions we can obtain information about the current emotional state of others (‘what’) but also about the timing of these information sources (‘when’). However, the perception and integration of multiple emotion expressions is prone to environmental noise and may be influenced by a specific situational context or learned knowledge. In our work on the temporal and neural correlates of multimodal emotion expressions we address a number of questions by means of ERPs and fMRI within a predictive coding framework. In my talk I will focus on the following questions: (1) How do we integrate verbal and non-verbal emotion expressions; (2) How does noise affect the integration of multiple emotion expressions; (3) How do cognitive demands impact the processing of multimodal emotion expressions; (4) How do we resolve interferences between verbal and non-verbal emotion expressions?




April 27, 2017

Speaker: Radha Nila Meghanathan (Leuven University, invited by Thomas lachmann)

Topic: Memory accumulation across sequential eye movements and related electrical brain activity

Abstract: Visual short term memory for items presented at fixation has been studied extensively informing us about memory capacity for features and objects, the fidelity of accumulated memory and the neural correlates of memory load. However, during free viewing, information is accumulated in working memory across sequences of fixations and saccades. We attempted to understand accumulation of memory across sequential eye movements. We proposed that memory load would be reflected during fixation intervals in electrical brain activity (EEG). To find this EEG correlate of memory accumulation, we conducted a combined multiple target visual search- change detection experiment with simultaneous eye movement and EEG recording. Participants were asked to search for and memorize the orientations of 3, 4 or 5 targets in a visual search display in order to perform a subsequent change detection task where one of the targets changed orientation in half of the cases. We studied eye movement properties, pupil size, fixation related brain potentials and EEG of participants during the task. In my talk, I present the analyses we performed, the obstacles we faced there in and the solutions we found, the results that followed, and also discuss our new understanding of working memory and information accumulation.


May 11, 2017

Speaker: Katherine Messenger (Warwick University, invited by Shanley Allen)

Topic: The persistence of priming: Exploring long-lasting syntactic priming effects in children and adults

Abstract: Syntactic priming, the unconscious repetition of syntactic structure across speakers and utterances, has been a key method in demonstrating the psychological reality of abstract syntactic representations that adults recruit in their language processing. Syntactic priming has therefore been applied to test children's knowledge of syntactic structures but more recently it has been framed as a mechanism that can also explain how these structures are acquired. This theory has been instantiated in computational models but support from behavioural evidence is still needed. In this talk I will present research investigating whether syntactic priming effects in children (and adults) are indicative of language learning.


May 18, 2017

Speaker: Bertram Opitz (Surrey University - UK, invited by Thomas Lachmann)

Topic: The mysteries of second language acquisition: a neuroscience perspective

Abstract: One of the most intense debates in second language acquisition regards the critical period hypothesis. This hypothesis claims that there is a critical period during someone's development that enables the acquisition of any human language. Based on research utilising an artificial language learning paradigm I will demonstrate that the same cognitive processes and highly similar brain regions are involved in first and second language acquisition, at least in the areas of the acquisition of syntax, orthography and emotional semantics. I will also demonstrate that cognitive and environmental constraints of the learning process determine individual differences in second language learning.


June 08, 2017

Speaker: Yaïr Pinto (Amsterdam University, invited by Thomas Schimidt)

Topic: What can permanent and temporary split-brain teach us about conscious unity?

Abstract: A healthy human brain only creates one conscious agent. In other words, under normal circumstances consciousness is unified. However, the brain is made up of many, semi-independent modules. So how is this conscious unity possible? Current leading consciousness theories differ on the answer to this question, but intuitively, it seems that informational integration between modules is the key. In the current talk, I will present data that challenges this intuition, and suggests that even without massive communication between modules conscious unity can persist. I will discuss why our intuition may be mistaken, and I will present alternative explanations of conscious unity.


June 22, 2017

Speaker: Norbert Jaušovec (Maribor University - Slovenia, invited by Saskia Jaarsveld)

Topic: Increasing intelligence

Abstract: The “Nürnberger Trichter” – a magic funnel used to pour knowledge, expertise and wisdom into students – demonstrates that the idea of effortless learning and the power of intelligence was “cool” even 500 years ago. Today noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), which involves transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation (tDCS and tACS), as well as random noise (tRNS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), could be regarded as a contemporary replacement for the magic funnel. They represent and extension to the more classical  methods for cognitive enhancement, such as behavioral training and computer games. On the other hand, there is still a number of alternative approaches that can affect cognitive function. Among the most prominent are: nutrition, drugs, exercise, meditation-related reduction in psychological stress and neurofeedback. The presentation will provide a concise overview of methods claiming to improve cognitive functioning – psychological constructs such as intelligence and working memory. Discussed will be changes in behavior and brain activation patterns observed with the electroencephalogram (EEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Examined will be the usefulness of brain training for the man/woman in the street, as well as an additional device that can verify and bring causation into the relations between brain activity and cognition. Modulating brain plasticity and by that changing network dynamics crucial for intelligent behavior can be a powerful research tool that can elucidate the neurobiological background of intelligence, working memory and other psychological constructs.


June 29, 2017

Speaker: Grégory Simon (Caen Basse-Normandie  University - France, invited by Thomas Lachmann)

Topic: Inhibition: a key factor for the cognitive development

Abstract: In the Laboratory for the Psychology of Child Development and Education (LaPsyDÉ - https://www.lapsyde.com/), our research projects mostly focus on the key role of inhibition processing during cognitive development. After presenting our major works in this field, I will focus more precisely on applied results from both behavioral and imaging (MRI, ERPs) assessments that deal with reading acquisition.






Donnerstag, der 27. Oktober 2016

Referent: Prof. Dr. Petra Hendricks (Gast von Prof. Allen und Frau Azpiroz)

Titel: "Production may precede comprehension in children’s development of language"

Abstract: It is generally assumed that comprehension precedes production in children’s development of language (e.g., Clark, 2003). That is, children first learn to comprehend a particular linguistic form and only later learn how this linguistic form must be used. However, several studies have found that, for some linguistic forms, adult-like production seems to be ahead of adult-like comprehension. For example, English and Dutch 4-year-olds know when to use a personal pronoun (him) and when to use a reflexive pronoun (himself), but make errors in their comprehension of personal pronouns until age 6 or even later (de Villiers, Cahillane & Altreuter, 2006; Spenader, Smits & Hendriks, 2009). Such production/comprehension asymmetries present a challenge to most linguistic theories. I will discuss several of these asymmetries and present a possible explanation for the existence of these asymmetries in terms of a constraint-based direction-sensitive grammar.


Donnerstag, der 03. November 2016

Referent: Dr. Jan Hirtz (TU Kaiserslautern) (Gast von Prof. Lachmann)

Titel: „Two-photon imaging of neuronal activity in mouse neocortex”



Donnerstag, der 10. November 2016

Referent: Dr. Diana Peppoloni (University of Siena) (Gast von Prof. Lachmann)

Titel: "Learning Complexity of English Language for Dyslexics: a Proposal for a Multisensory and Interactive Approach

Abstract: English knowledge constitutes a basic requirement for undergraduates to complete their academic career and move into the world of work. This goal is difficult to achieve for dyslexic students, since dyslexia is a specific learning disease that affects not only literacy skills in students’ first language, but also foreign language learning. This is even more evident when the target language has an opaque orthography, such as the English one. For this reason, it is required that educational research identifies new teaching-learning strategies which, through personalized pathways, could enhance the potential of all students to promote their educational success. If not all students learn in the same way, then we have to interpret their cognitive style to maximize their performances.

Research results suggest that dyslexics prefer to learn in a multisensory, creative way; that’s why language lessons should integrate at the same time action and emotions. Complementarity between right and left brain hemisphere seems to be the key to enhance their learning process (GG-Hypothesis). The latest findings in the field of neurosciences give a new and robust scaffolding to our belief that drama activities boost language learning. Therefore, theatrical didactics seems to constitute the best suitable practice to convey linguistic knowledge to dyslexics. Involving many sensorial channels, it promotes the development of strong and persistent cortical and subcortical bindings, responsible for the storage both of linguistic and affective information. I will present in this talk, an original didactic method, conceived to overcome the most common problems related to the acquisition of oral skills in second language learning, based on theatrical didactics, in which “mind” and “body” are both fully involved as it happens in any real communication situation. Through a holistic approach, it aims at providing college dyslexic students with repeatable mechanisms of linguistic and communicative knowledge acquisition, which can be then put in place and reused in different learning opportunities, making this kind of learners self-confident and enabling them to build their own set of skills in an autonomous way.


Donnerstag, der 17. November 2016



Donnerstag, der 24. November 2016

Referent: Dr. Huaiyong Zhao (Department of Psychology an der  TU Darmstadt) Gast von Prof. Ghose

Titel: "How do people steer a car to intercept a moving target:The constant target‑heading strategy."

Abstract: Successful interaction with moving targets in an environment is vital to human’s survival. Locomotor interception of a moving target is one of the interactions. Three strategies have been proposed for locomotor interception: in the pursuit strategy, the target is kept at the heading direction; in the constant target‑heading strategy, it is kept at a constant angle relative to the heading direction; in the constant bearing strategy, it is kept at a constant bearing angle relative to an allocentric reference axis. In my study, I examine how drivers steer a car to intercept a moving target in virtual environments. Steering in virtual environment does not have the spatial or temporal limitations in real environment. Moreover, virtual environment enables me to manipulate the availability of visual information. These advantages may help reveal the strategy used in locomotor interception. In this talk, I will present three experiments, and show participants’ interceptive steering in different environments. The results suggest that locomotor interception is better accounted for by the constant target‑heading strategy.


Donnerstag, der 01. Dezember 2016

Vergabe von Labrotation in Cognitive Science Prof. Dr. Thomas Lachmann


Donnerstag, der 08. Dezember 2016

Referent: Andrey R. Nikolaev, PhD (Laboratory for Perceptual Dynamics, Brain & Cognition Research Unit, KU Leuven, Belgium)  (Gast von Prof. Lachmann)

Titel:" EEG-eye movement co-registration: method and application to free viewing behavior"

Abstract: Information about the surrounding space is visually sampled with saccadic eye movements. Eye movements are tightly coupled with brain activity which reflects the perceptual and cognitive processes. Recent advances in eye-tracking technology have allowed researchers to use eye movements as markers for segmentation of ongoing EEG activity into episodes relevant to sequential steps of information processing. Consequently, the simultaneous recording of EEG and eye movements has increasingly become popular in various fields of vision research. The co-registration of EEG and eye movements is particularly advantageous for the investigation of processes associated with free visual exploration of the environment. In my talk I’ll discuss methodological aspects of the EEG-eye movement co-registration in free viewing and will give examples of its application. Particularly, I’ll focus on the problem of overlapping effects on EEG of subsequent eye movements and will show the ways of its solution. Then, I’ll describe several studies from our laboratory which considered visual memory encoding, visual search, and saccade guidance. My talk will contribute to a better understanding of the range of research questions that can be approached by the co-registration, the requirements for experimentation, and methodological solutions for simultaneous EEG and eye movement recording and data processing.


Donnerstag, der 12. Januar 2017

Referentin: Dr. Sonja Eisenbeiss (University zu Köln)  (Gast von Prof. Allen)

Thema: Studying Child Language in India

Abstract: In this talk, I will present initial results and new tools from cross-linguistic studies of Indian languages developed together with colleagues Pori Saikia (University of Essex), Benu Pareek (JNU, Delhi), and Ayesha Kidwai (JNU, Delhi). I will first present results of our studies on grammatical markers in Hindi and Assamese child language. Then, I will discuss new tools that we are currently developing for comparative studies on children´s and adults´use of grammatical markers in different regions of India. The focus of this discussion will be on the challenges of conducting cross-linguistic and comparative research in a culturally and linguistically diverse region.


Donnerstag, der 19. Januar 2017

Referent: Prof. Dr. Alfred  Effenberg (Leibniz Universität Hannover) Gast von Dr. Schinauer

Thema: "Auditory Modulation of Multisensory Representations"

Abstract: Motor learning is based on motor perception and emergent perceptual-motor representations. A lot of behavioral research is related to single perceptual modalities but during last two decades the contribution of multimodal perception on motor behavior was discovered more and more. A growing number of studies indicates an enhanced impact of multimodal stimuli on motor perception, motor control and motor learning in terms of better precision and higher reliability of the related actions. Our own research is dedicated to real world actions: It will be shown that kinematic real-time acoustics can be used (1) to enhance perceptual-motor representations as well as (2) to enhance the perceptual and motor performance and (3) to modulate the perception systematically by changing the kinematic-acoustic mapping stepwise.



Donnerstag, der 26. Januar 2017

Referent: Prof. Dr. Stefan Koelsch (University in Bergen) (Gast von Prof. Lachmann)

Title: Brain correlates of music-evoked emotions

Abstract: Music is a universal feature of human societies, partly owing to its power to evoke strong emotions and influence moods. During the past decade, the investigation of the neural correlates of music-evoked emotions has been invaluable for the understanding of human emotion.

Functional neuroimaging studies on music and emotion show that music can modulate activity in brain structures that are known to be crucially involved in emotion, such as the amygdala, nucleus accumbens, hypothalamus, hippocampus, insula, cingulate cortex and orbitofrontal cortex. The potential of music to modulate activity in these structures has important implications for the use of music in the treatment of psychiatric and neurological disorders.


Donnerstag, der 02. Februar 2017

Referent: Dr. Katharina Nimz (Bielefeld University) (Gast von Prof. Allen)

Title: Second language speech learning: the case of vowel perception and production in L2 German

Abstract: Learning to speak a foreign language is hard. When it comes to German vowels, L2 learners have to master various phonetic dimensions which most likely differ from those in their L1. For example, German differentiates between long, tense and short lax vowels, and it is crucial for an L2 learner to perceive and produce the difference between, for example, (“instalment”) and (“rat”). It has been hypothesized that both Turkish and Polish learners have difficulties acquiring this difference, but – up until the present study – this has not been tested experimentally. 
By means of various production and perception experiments, we investigated whether and how learners have problems learning important acoustic dimensions such as duration and spectral features. Furthermore, we investigated the influence of orthography in second language speech learning. This factors has, as of recently, received considerable attention in the field, and the present study is the first to experimentally investigate the influence of orthographic markers in L2 German speech.



Donnerstag, der 09. Februar 2017

Referent: Prof. Dr. Kielan Yarrow (City University London) (Gast von Prof. Ghose)

Title: Can classification videos reveal the information used to respond to an opponent’s tennis stroke?

Abstract: Experts are able to predict the outcome of their opponent’s next action (e.g. a tennis stroke) based on kinematic cues “read” from preparatory body movements. This ability has been revealed in occlusion experiments, which present sporting scenarios with different possible outcomes (e.g. a cross-court or down-the-line tennis return) but remove segments of video (e.g. by stopping the video at ball contact) in order to assess how behaviour is affected. Here, we instead used classification-image techniques to find out how participants discriminate sporting scenarios as they unfold.

We filmed tennis players serving and hitting forehands, each with two possible directions. These videos were presented to novices and club-level amateurs, running from 800ms before to 200ms after racquet-ball contact. During practice, participants reported shot direction under a time limit targeting 90% accuracy. Participants then viewed videos through Gaussian windows ("Bubbles") placed at random in the temporal (E1), spatial (E2) or spatiotemporal (E3) domains. Comparing Bubbles from correct and incorrect trials revealed the contribution of information from different regions toward a correct response.

Temporally, two regions supported accurate responding (from ~50 ms before ball contact to 100+ ms afterwards, and, for forehands, at around the time of swing initiation, ~300 ms before ball contact). Spatially, information was accrued from the ball trajectory and from the opponent’s head, perhaps reflecting their gaze direction. Spatiotemporal bubbles again highlighted ball trajectory information, but seemed susceptible to an attentional cuing artefact. Overall, there seems to be potential to help players improve by showing them from when/where they read information, but our results so far have been dominated by the information accrued from the ball trajectory, rather than earlier kinematic cues. This may reflect the competent, but not elite, standard of our tennis players. We are now analysing data from experiments that focus on the period before ball contact, and hope to present our preliminary findings from these newer experiments in order to promote discussion of collaborative follow-up work.




Ende der Vorlesungszeit im WS

November 23, 2017

Psychology Colloquia/Kolloquium "Cognitive Science" im Sommersemester 2016

Donnerstags 15:30 bis 17:00 Uhr in Geb. 57, Raum 508


Donnerstag, der 28. April 2016

Gast von Prof. Lachmann


Donnerstag, der 12. Mai 2016

Referent: Dr. Marcus Heldmann (Universität Lübeck) (Gast von Prof. Lachmann)

Title: The impact of cognitive control on the maintenance of dyslexia: implications and electrophysiological evidence

Abstract: One critical aspect in the maintenance of dyslexia is the inability of affected persons to detect errors in their own writing. This impaired error sensitivity is assumed to promote the consolidation of memory representations of incorrect word spellings. In our present research we are able to show, that impaired error sensitivity affects event-related components in the EEG, which are assumed to reflect cognitive control processes. We are also able to show that cognitive control processes vary with the development of reading and writing skills in children. Based on these findings we would like to argue for a training program in children with impaired writing abilities that is based on the principles of errorless learning procedures.


Freitag, der 13. Mai 2016  (Vortrag in Geb. 57 Raum 315 um 10:00 Uhr und nicht wie bisher angekündigt in Geb. 6, )

Referent: Prof. Dr. Padraic Monaghan, Lancaster University  (Gast von Prof. Allen)

Title: Degeneracy and language learning

Abstract: A key question in the cognitive sciences is how, despite the enormous variation in linguistic experience, the language learner acquires broadly the same language structure, “within a fairly narrow range” (Chomsky 2005). Traditional answers to this question have involved determining the extent to which language structure is learnable from language exposure, and sometimes concluding that it cannot. However, this perspective on learning ignores the broader environmental context in which language is acquired, where learning can benefit from multiple information sources. In this talk, I describe a series of computational and experimental studies demonstrating how multiple cues, including linguistic, para-linguistic, and extra-linguistic information, can cohere to result in learning that is certainly within a fairly narrow range. This "degeneracy" of the communicative environment, where multiple cues point probabilistically to language structure, enables quick and robust acquisition to be accomplished despite considerable environmental variation.


Donnerstag, der 19. Mai 2016

Referent: Bilge Sayim PhD (University of Bern) (Gast von Prof. Lachmann)

Title: Crowding and Appearance in Peripheral Vision

Abstract: To perceive and navigate in complex environments, humans rely strongly on information from the visual periphery. A severe limit of peripheral vision is crowding – the inability to identify objects in clutter that are easily identified in isolation. For example, a letter presented in the periphery that can be identified when presented alone, is indiscernible when flanked by close-by letters. Crowding does not only deteriorate performance but also changes target appearance. However, only few studies have addressed the appearance of crowded stimuli, even though the specific kinds of appearance changes may be key to understanding crowding. Here, I will present results that show how crowded appearance predicts performance, introduce appearance-based methods that reveal error characteristics of crowding that are not revealed in standard crowding paradigms, and show how visual artists may play a key role in shedding light on the underlying mechanisms of crowding.



Donnerstag, der 02. Juni 2016




Donnerstag, der 09. Juni 2016

Referent: Dr. Jens Schwarzbach (Universität Regensburg) (Gast von Prof. T. Schmidt)


"Brainstate dependency in studying neural coding of perception and action”



Donnerstag, der 16. Juni 2016

Referent: Leor Roseman, PhD, Centre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Imperial College London, UK (Gast von Prof. Allen)

Titel: "Neural correlates of LSD-induced, eyes-closed, psychedelic imagery"
Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) is a psychedelic drug that induces an altered state of consciousness characterized by visual hallucinations. Healthy participants were injected with LSD (75 μg) or placebo and underwent 14-min fMRI resting-state scans. During LSD sessions (but not in placebo sessions) two distinct patterns were observed: First, subjective ratings of eyes-closed psychedelic imagery were positively correlated with significant increases in functional connectivity between the primary visual cortex (V1) and other regions; bilateral striatum, insular cortex, operculum cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, superior and middle temporal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, angular gyrus, paracingulate gyrus and medial posterior thalamus. Second, eyes-closed functional connectivity within the visual network (between V1 and V3) mimicked patterns defined as characteristic to perceptual localizations of de facto presented stimuli.

As the first modern neuroimaging LSD study, it has been widely reported (and harshly misinterpreted) in the media during the last weeks. I will attempt to clarify recurrent misconceptions and compare our findings to psychedelic imagery research conducted in the 50’s and 60’s.


Donnerstag, der 30. Juni 2016

Referent: Prof. Dr. Andreas Nieder (Universität Tübingen) (Gast von Prof. Friauf)

Referat: "Intelligence without a cerebral cortex - lessons from crows"

Abstract: Even though corvids (jays, jackdaws, crows and ravens) lack a layered neocortex, they possess high-level cognitive capabilities that match primates in many respects. The nidopallium caudolaterale (NCL) of the avian endbrain is a key brain area to enable corvids’ remarkable behavioural flexibility and is considered to be a functional equivalent of primate prefrontal cortex. We explore the neuronal foundation of corvid intelligence by recording single-unit activity from the NCL of carrion crows performing cognitive tasks. Crows were trained to learn associations, temporarily retain information in working memory, and make flexible rule-guided decisions. Sustained activity of NCL neurons serves to bridge temporal gaps, thereby offering a workspace for retaining immediately passed information, processing it according to abstract behavioural principles, and preparing for future actions. These findings emphasize that intelligence in vertebrates does not necessarily rely on a neocortex, but can be realized in endbrain circuitries that developed independently via convergent evolution.


Donnerstag, der 07. Juli 2016





Donnerstag, der 14. Juli 2016

Referent: Kepa Paz-Allonzo (BCBL) (Gast von Prof. Czernochowski)

Referat: "Neural correlates of the testing effect"

Abstract: Extensive behavioral evidence has demonstrated that retrieval practice is highly beneficial for long-term memory. However, the neural mechanisms underlying the testing effect remain relatively elusive. Here we sought to investigate the role of the hippocampus and cortical regions typically associated with retrieval success on the testing effect using functional and structural MRI. Thirty-seven adults studied 100 Swahili-Spanish word pairs, under repeated retrieval or repeated study conditions, and underwent MRI scanning 48 hours after encoding. fMRI results revealed that although similar brain regions were recruited for study- and retrieval-practice conditions, differential MTL activation and functional connectivity with MTL profiles emerged for successful retrieval as a function of these conditions. Structural analyses showed that total left hippocampus and left CA3/4 and dentate gyrus subfield volumes predicted successful retrieval only for information learned via study practice. Our findings showed differential hippocampal involvement and

MTL-cortical neural dynamics as a function of the learning strategy.



Ende der Vorlesungszeit im SS 16

Psychology Colloquia/Kolloquium "Cognitive Science" im Wintersemester 2015-2016

Donnerstag um 15:30h bis 18:00h, Geb. 57, Raum 508


Donnerstag, der 19. November 2015

Referent: Dr. Nora Schaal (Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf) (Gast von Prof. Czernochowski)

Referat:"Modulating pitch memory using non-invasive brain stimulation methods"

Abstract: Memory for pitch is an important factor for music and language processing. Behavioural research suggests a specific storage mechanism for pitch information and brain imaging studies have highlighted a complex neural network underlying pitch memory. As functional brain imaging studies cannot reveal causal involvements of neural areas of interest and cognitive tasks, non-invasive brain stimulation methods are better suited. In my talk I will introduce three non-invasive brain stimulation techniques (transcranial direct current stimulation, transcranial alternating current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation) and will discuss three studies using these techniques in order to modulate pitch memory abilities and to investigate the significance of targeted brain areas for the pitch memory process. Furthermore, I will talk about whether neural specificities for pitch memory can be found for musicians, as experts in the musical domain and amusics, who dispose a pitch memory deficit.


Donnerstag, der 26. November 2015

Referent: Prof. Dr. Christine Schiltz (COSA Institute, University of Luxembourg) (Gast von Prof. Lachmann)

Referat: How do space and language influence number concept learning?

Abstract: A major challenge in math classes is the fact that numerical concepts and symbols are abstract. Especially for young children, this abstractness stands in contrast to their preference of concrete situations and problems.

Recently, it has been proposed that even the most abstract concepts, such as numbers, are rooted in concrete body-related processes – an idea termed “embodied cognition”. Here we will analyze how number concepts relate to the concrete aspect of space and consider recent evidence providing insights into the mechanisms underlying number-space associations and their development (e.g. Goffaux et al., 2012; Hoffmann et al., 2013).

Besides the sensori-motor influence on number concepts, the learner’s context and especially his/her language environment also plays a critical role in shaping number concepts. Investigations into the relation between language and numerical cognition - in particular the question how multi-lingual persons conceive and process numbers -  have lately regained interest. Here we will present and discuss recent findings from studies on the influence of language on numerical cognition in a multilingual context such as Luxembourg (e.g. Van Rinsveld et al., 2015).

Taken together we hope that this work on the relationship between the domain-general aspects of space and language and number concepts will help us understand how number symbols are represented and why and how people differ in their numerical understandings.


Donnerstag, der 03. Dezember 2015





Donnerstag, der 10. Dezember 2015





Donnerstag, der 14. Januar 2016

Referent: Dr. Mathias Vukelic (IAO. Fraunhofer, Stuttgart) (Gast von Dr. Tina Weis)

Referat: Utilizing brain-based interaction between humans and machines for neuro-adaptive technologies

Abstract: In the last four decades brain-based interaction between humans and machines – known as Brain-Computer or Brain-Robotic Interfaces - has been investigated extensively. Using such innovative technology, relevant information from the user can be continuously detected by recognizing users’ mental, cognitive and emotional state. Based on this extracted information, the attributes of interactive digital systems and technical environments can be adjusted accordingly – leading to neuro-adaptive systems. While most research is aimed at the design of assistive, supportive or restorative systems for severely disabled persons, the last decade additionally showed new research towards applications for people without physical impairments in the field of Human-Technology Interaction (HTI). I will present recent and ongoing research of two categories of brain-based interaction in which neuro-adaptive systems can be used for medical applications, i.e. to restore motor functions after stroke and for HTI in general, i.e. to design assistive technologies which are more user-oriented.


Donnerstag, der 21. Januar 2016

Referent: Prof. Dr. Laura Winther Balling (Copenhagen Business School) (Gast von Prof. Allen)

Referat: Text and Sentence Processing in the lab and in the wild

Abstract: I will present my work on sentence and text processing, two lines of research which are at the same time closely related and fundamentally different. The close relation lies, among other things, in the fact that sentence and text processing are adjacent levels of processing, with considerable impact of sentence level phenomena on text processing. The fundamental difference is in the approach: I study sentence processing in strictly controlled experiments and text processing in a much more naturalistic setup. In addition to talking about the findings in these two lines of research, I will present my view of pros and cons of the different approaches, and hope to discuss with the audience ways of making research on language processing in the lab as informative as possible about language processing in the wild.


Donnerstag, der 28. Januar 2016





Donnerstag, der 04. Februar 2016





Donnerstag, der 11. Februar 2016

Referent: Prof. Dr. Juhani Järvikivi (Department of Linguistics, University of Alberta) (Gast von Prof. Allen)

Referat: Preschoolers’ processing of pronouns in speech – Snapshots from the visual world

Abstract: How people assign reference to pronouns has received a lot of attention in psycholinguistics. Even though we understand many of the linguistic and contextual cues that direct attention to referents in adult language comprehension, relatively little is still known about how young children go about this feat given the time constraints of normal conversation.

The advent of the visual world eye tracking paradigm has advanced the study of children’s language processing. These studies typically ask whether children show sensitivity to the same sources of information and/or similar parsing strategies as adults. Studies have used the look-and-listen variant of the paradigm offer a series of snapshots into young children’s pronoun processing suggesting that their online (and offline) comprehension is sensitive to many of the same cues as adult processing (e.g., Arnold et al., 2005; Pyykkönen et al., 2010; Hartshorne et al., 2015). However, these results differ markedly with respect to the timecourse of the effects – children seem to be consistently slower. These differences can be (and have been) attributed either to children’s language knowledge (experience) or cognitive maturation (memory, cognitive control).

In this light, I will briefly review some of the recent literature on children’s online processing of reference and discuss some of our recent and ongoing work investigating preschoolers’ comprehension of ambiguous pronouns – in particular, how sentence/information structure and visual cues affect children’s (and adults’) pronoun comprehension.



Ende der Vorlesungszeit im WS 15-16

Zum Seitenanfang